Quantcast
Channel: Comments on: Poor reporting on reproducing virus
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

By: Kadamose

$
0
0

Re:Already been done

Well, I guess you're right in a sense – the AIDs virus was not a virus built from the ground up. It's actually a mutation of 2 viruses – the Visna virus, and HTLV-1. (Human T-cell Leukemia Virus). Keep in mind, that these two virused were not spliced together – (which many proofs already discredit) -instead, they were tricked to 'pickyback' each other and replicate – this 'pickyback' feature is the same feature seen when taking over a T-cell host. Don't ask me how they did it, but they did.

If you think I'm giving way too much credit to some scientists who have been dead for maybe over a decade now, you're wrong. Think about it for a moment – who wrote the textbooks that you, like everyone else, gained their knowledge on how these systems work? Though many people would like to believe that 'creating viruses' is something new, it's a misguided delusion, and there really isn't anything new under the sun.

Do you honestly think that if someone created a virus that it would automatically spread to the news the next day? I don't think so – knowledge like this is only given on a need to know basis. That's how power and secrecy works. And no, I am not being paranoid – this is simply how the world works.

I could even go on about how SARS was also made through man's tinkering, but I don't have any sources at the moment to back this claim up. I definitely believe that to be the case, however, and I am not easily persuaded, either.

And believe it or not, more than 75% of the conspiracy theories out there are TRUE. And even those that aren't entirely true, have pieces of truth in them.

Secrecy is such and ugly and stupid thing – if there was no secrecy, our technological (and pscyhcological) development would be light years ahead of what it is today.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

Latest Images

Trending Articles





Latest Images